Share this

Dismissals

What is a dismissal?

  • An employment relationship comes into existence when one person (“employee”) assists or places his/her services at the use and control of another person (“employer”) in exchange for compensation (for example, money or something else). Usually, the terms and conditions of that employment relationship are contained in a contract of employment.
  • A dismissal is when a contract of employment between an employer and employee is terminated by the employer. In other words, against the will of the employee.
  • The Labour Relations Act (“LRA”) provides every employee with the right not to be unfairly dismissed.
  • This means that an employer may not just willy-nilly dismiss an employee whenever s/he feels like it, the employer must have a fair reason for making the decision to dismiss and must follow a fair procedure.

When may an employee be dismissed?

The LRA permits an employer to dismiss his/her employee for one of the following reasons:

  • misconduct by the employee, for example, if the employee is guilty of theft, being absent without authorisation, refusing to obey the employer’s instructions and so on;
  • incapacity of the employee, for example, when an employee fails to meet the employer’s performance standard or when an employee fails to perform the work s/he was employed to do because of his/her ill health; or
  • operational requirements of the employer, for example, if the employer had a drop in sales and cannot afford the employee any longer. Please see the Quicklaw on Retrenchments for more information.

What is misconduct?

  • Misconduct is considered to be the unacceptable or improper behaviour of an employee.
  • Not all misconduct will justify the sanction of a dismissal, only serious misconduct will. In determining the seriousness of a misconduct, the following factors must be considered:
    • Is there a rule in the workplace about the misconduct? A rule may be set out in the employer’s disciplinary code and procedure, policies and procedures, or any other evidence proving that the rule is in place; and
    • If there is a rule about the misconduct, is the rule:
      • valid or reasonable? A rule must be based on facts and not just a rumour of a rule;
      • known to the employee? A rule will be known to the employee if it was brought to his/her attention or if it was made available to the employee; if the rule is common knowledge to all the employees working for the employer; or if the rule is part of the employer’s past practice;
      • consistently applied by the employer towards all employees? The same sanctions were given in respect of the same or similar misconduct in the past; and
      • serious enough to justify dismissal as an appropriate sanction? There must be a breakdown of the trust relationship between the employer and the employee in order for a dismissal to be an appropriate sanction.

 What is incapacity?

  • Incapacity is considered to be the inability or the incompetence of an employee to do the work that s/he was employed to do.
  • Incapacity as a result of poor performance:
    • The employer may set performance standards for employees. If the employee is not meeting the performance standards of the employer, the following factors must be considered:
      • is the employee aware of the performance standards? Performance standards are usually contained in the employee’s key performance areas; industry norms; explained to the employee in writing or verbally; or obvious;
      • have the employee been given a chance to meet the employer’s performance standard or to improve? This must be done through guidance, monitoring, training and then evaluation; and
      • will dismissal be an appropriate sanction for the employee’s underperformance? If the employee still underperforms despite the employer giving him/her a chance, dismissal will be an appropriate sanction.
  • Incapacity as a result of ill health:
    • It is when the employee’s health makes him/her incapable of performing the work s/he was employed to do. Ill health may take many forms, for example, illnesses, injuries, diseases, disabilities and/or conditions.
    • Once the employer identifies that the employee is suffering from ill health, the following factors must be considered:
      • what is the extent of the employee’s ill health? An employee’s ill health can either be permanent or temporary;
      • what is the results of the employee’s medical examination by a medical practitioner or assessment by an occupational therapist? The employee cannot be forced to undergo an assessment or medical examination;
      • can the needs of the employee with ill health be accommodated by adapting his/her existing work, workplace, working equipment and so on? An employer will not have to accommodate the employee if it will suffer unjustified hardship. For example, if the business of the employer cannot sustain the employee being absent for a long period; and
      • are there any alternatives to dismissal? For example, appointing an employee in a different position, such as a filing clerk can now become a switchboard operator.

What is the procedure leading up to dismissal?

  • The procedure for misconduct related dismissals are:
    • conduct an investigation to determine whether there is proof of the suspected misconduct;
    • make clear charges in respect of the suspected misconduct so that the employee has enough information to prepare for the disciplinary hearing;
    • give reasonable notice of the disciplinary hearing. Notice may be given orally or in writing at least 48 hours before the disciplinary hearing. If the employee is absent on the day of the disciplinary hearing, without a valid reason, the chairperson may proceed with the hearing in the employee’s absence;
    • provide the employee with an opportunity to respond to the suspected misconduct at the disciplinary hearing and to lead evidence. The chairperson must first consider the evidence of both the employer and the employee before deciding whether the employee is guilty or not of the suspected misconduct;
    • grant the employee the right of representation by his/her trade union (with organisational rights) or a colleague at the disciplinary hearing (legal representation is not a right, but can be applied for);
    • provide the employee with an opportunity to provide evidence in mitigation in response to the employer’s evidence in aggravation. If the chairperson decides that the employee is guilty, the chairperson must consider the mitigating and aggravating circumstances before deciding on dismissal or some other sanction; and
    • provide the employee with the chairperson’s decision, preferably in writing.
  • The procedure for incapacity related dismissals are similar to the procedure in misconduct related dismissals, however, a counselling process must be adopted. This means that the employee must be involved with the procedure and give his/her input from the investigation stage to the dismissal.

What remedy does an employee have if s/he has been unfairly dismissed?

  • The employee must refer a dispute to the CCMA or relevant Bargaining Council within 30 days from date of dismissal. The referral is done by completing a form.
  • Should the employee be out of time, s/he may still refer the dispute, but s/he will have to make an application for condonation confirming the reasons for his/her delay.
  • An employee may choose to claim:
    • For the employer to reinstate him/her on the same terms and conditions of employment before his/her dismissal.
    • For the employer to re-employ him/her, which may be on new terms and conditions of employment.
    • For the employer to pay compensation to him/her (based on the monthly compensation received at the time of the dismissal). The employee may be given compensation, depending on the circumstances, of 12 months or less.

Glossary of terms:
AGGRAVATION: factors given by the employer to convince the chairperson that the employee must be dismissed or some other sanction should be given. Examples of aggravating circumstances of the employer include the disciplinary record of the employee (previous warnings for similar misconduct); impact of the misconduct on the employer; breakdown of the trust relationship; the level of seniority of the employee; and so on.CHAIRPERSON: the person chairing the disciplinary hearing. The chairperson must be independent, fair and objective.
EVIDENCE: documents, witness statements, photographs, video footage and so on.
MITIGATION: factors given by the employee to convince the chairperson that s/he must not be dismissed, but be given some other sanction. Mitigating circumstances of the employee include his/her length in service; a clean disciplinary record (no previous warnings); whether or not the employee shows remorse; the employee’s personal circumstances, such as whether or not the employee is the sole breadwinner of his/her family; and so on.
SANCTION: include a written warning, final written warning, suspension without pay or dismissal.


How can LegalWise assist you?

Should you require an explanation of your rights on this topic, please contact your nearest Branch.

DISCLAIMER:

The information contained on this website is aimed at providing members of the public with self-help guidance on the law. The information applies to South Africa, unless it is specifically stated that the information applies to another country. Although LegalWise has tried to ensure that the information is accurate and current, it is important to remember that the law constantly changes. And, although LegalWise has tried to provide information of a high quality, we cannot guarantee that the information will be updated and/or be without errors or omissions. As a result, LegalWise, its employees, agents or representatives will under no circumstances accept liability or be held liable for the consequences resulting from, the use of or the inability to use the information, or, any negligence by us relating to the information so used. The information contained on this website has not been provided to meet the individual requirements of a specific person and we insist that legal advice be obtained relating to a person’s unique circumstances.